For boys who like boys who like joysticks!


« Video: Super Mario World... Live Action! | Main | Neversoft Gleams The Cube, Kicks Tony Hawk To The Curb »

A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia

Like many of you, recently I purchased the latest installment in the Prince of Persia series. Opinions on its radical design, character, and story changes have players and critics split between singing its praises and damning its faults as if it was the latest Britney album. After playing through it I've got a few things to say about it (good and bad), but in order to have any real discussion on the game we're going to head into spoiler territory. So if don't want the experience totally ruined I would advice you to stop reading this article now. However, if you've finished the game (or don't care about the story too much) follow me into the jump for a discussion about all types of fertile grounds.

Simply stated, Prince of Persia was one of the best and worst games that I experienced in 2008. The beautiful artwork, flowing animation, and tight controls contrasted with the sloppy bugs, awkward storytelling, hollow combat, and what is easily the worst narrative ending I have ever experienced across any media. Ubisoft Montreal's took a lot of chances with the very core elements of the series which varying degrees of success and failure, leaving this player ultimately conflicted over the entire experience.

Let's look at what went right with this game. The storybook-inspired visuals of the game are fantastic. The Prince's "still emo at heart" look still has a few silly elements to it, but at least makes steps in the right direction. Elika's visual character design is flawless. Each area of the game displays a good amount of personality. The only element of the game's visuals that I didn't think was as effective as it could have been was the "transformation" of each area as Elika healed it. I felt as if the game engine just boosted colors that were already there and removed fog. Unlike the day and night difference seen during the area transformations in Okami (an obvious influence over the entire game), these moments didn't carry the punch that they needed to. Other than this minor issue, no one should walk away from this game unimpressed with the visuals they've seen.

It seems like everyone has a different take on the game's "No death" design. I for one could not have been happier with how this was implemented when exploring each area. By making death a non-issue, I was more likely to explore and experiment with the Prince's abilities. It takes the game away from precision platforming roots, but embraces the open world layout that the game introduces to the series. This combined with the streamlined controls for performing complex moves made the experience of discovering every nook and cranny of each area an absolute joy. Some complained it made the game too easy, but unless they found all 1,001 light seeds I don't want to hear it. There is challenge in this game if you look for it (more on this later).

But just like Elika's kingdom halfway through the game, there are bright and dark spots all over Prince of Persia's design. The most apparent to me right off the bat was combat. Try as they might to make this interesting, but the series' different approaches to combat have never interested me outside of the 1989 original on my old Macintosh. The combat in Sands of Time was labored, too long, and had that girl I wanted to leave behind firing arrows at me the whole time. In this installment, it's still labored, still too long, and now replaces my backstabbing sidekick with a lazy magic user with god-like abilities to save me from death whenever she feels like it but isn't all that helpful with taking the bad guys down. While the "No death" design worked gloriously with level exploration, it devalued the significance of combat. Making this even worse was when enemies would regenerate their health upon my many deaths. While this was likely designed to offer me an incentive not to screw up, this didn't provide me with any type of meaningful impact beyond wasting my time and forcing me to whittle my foe's life bar down again.

One area of the game that wasn't a smashing success or crushing failure was the non-linear storytelling level layouts, and progression. Due to how each of the four "big areas" is unlocked, any type of progression is essentially frozen after the first two hours of the game until you reach the final battle. One NeoGAF forum poster made an interesting observation on the character development of this game and compared it to a book where you read the first two chapters of the story in order, go through chapters three through eight in any order of your choosing, and then chapters nine and ten last. The opportunities for meaningful character development inherently suffers because they characters cannot change for the bulk of the story because of continuity issues. The story also has pacing issues throughout the majority of the game and the entire experience suffers because of it.

From a level layout perspective, the nonlinear aspect opened the door to a lot of possibilities, but I feel that it was mostly wasted here. While you could take on gameplay tasks in any order, the routes to the player travels on were painfully linear. When you looked at the map, you saw exactly how linear the player's path really is since you cannot divert from its rigid confines in anyway. Personally I feel that the game should have approached this the other way around, with a linear order of tasks with multiple ways of getting there. This would address my storytelling issues and provide the player with a better sense of exploration.

For the most part, these issues are forgivable and are inherent risks when drastically changing the core design of a long established series. The team deserves mountains of praise for taking these chances, but anyone responsible for the game's ending should be fired. No other game has ever infuriated me like this game's ending. It's a cheap narrative ploy that betrays a least one character while essentially belittling the player's effort in order to make a sequel. To explain my anger with this requires a little bit of back story.

At a recent game design conference I had the absolute pleasure of hearing Sheri Graner Ray speak on the concept of "player currency." Her belief (and one that I share) is that the most valuable currency that a player can spend on a game is not money, but time. If we keep this in mind, good game design should always respect and reward the player for their time. This is exactly why Prince of Persia's "No death" system largely works for me. Only rarely do I feel like my time is wasted and the game will quickly return me back to a safe spot whenever I make a mistake. With the search for Light Seeds there are instant rewards for "just playing around" as well as boss encounters that reward my larger efforts. These aspects are balanced very well and effective in keeping me returning to the game. The game's ending is a totally different story however.

For those that want the recap and spoilers, while the Prince and Elika heal all the fertile grounds throughout the game, it's revealed that the reason that Ahrimen (the bad guy) is free is because Elika's father used the protective force used to imprison Ahrimen to grant Elika life after her own death. By healing the lands of corruption, Elika is essentially losing her life and giving it back to the land. This all comes to ahead when the Prince and Elika face Ahrimen in battle and seal him off for good. The battle is won at a tragic price: Elika's life. As the game's first round of credits start to role (a recent gaming trend more obnoxious than lens flare), the Prince takes Elika's body up to the resting alter. After laying her down on the alter, he finds himself stricken with guilt/remorse/shame and then chops down all the protective seals/trees holding Ahrimen back and restores life to Elika once again. The Prince does this knowing that Ahrimen and his corruptive forces will be released once again, but does it anyway. Upon waking up and seeing the Prince as everything begins to crumble around them, Elika asks the same question that I shouted at the TV in unison: Why?

Elika knew what she was doing by healing the lands and she was prepared to die if it meant holding Ahrimen back for the rest of time, so why would the Prince, who spent the entire game being a self-centered egotistical brat, suddenly care about Elika? And if he really did care about her why would he defy her wishes and negate everything they've done by bringing her back to life? The game offers no explanation for this but did give me the "To Be Continued" achievement.

So basically everything that I did in the eight hours it took to go through the game meant nothing and I'm going to need to fork over at least another $60 to Ubisoft and another eight hours to maybe do something about it? If my time with this game was truly currency, Prince of Persia collected stacks of it then lit it on fire in front of my face just to see what kind of reaction I would have. It's a shame that this is how they choose to close this game because I was able to see past the game's flaws and missteps before the writers decided to completely invalidate every moment of success the story had to offer. This is made worse by the "To Be Continued" achievement popping up right before the "real" credits, highlighting the facts that what I'm seeing isn't complete and my only interest in the game moving forward is to see if Elika decides to not protect the Prince the next time he jumps off a cliff.

I'm still on the fence if I will be joining the Prince and Elika on their next adventure. Like I stated in the beginning of this article, Prince of Persia is one of the best and worst games that I played last year. At its brightest moments it is the moving, beautiful, and evocative experience that delivers on its promise. During it's moments of darkness, the game is uninteresting and unable to free itself from its own set up and sequel requirements.


Oldtaku said:

I have to say I liked the ending. The Prince (and most likely the player) haven't really thought about what they're accomplishing here other than just helping Elika do what she needs to do and stopping Ahriman. He doesn't know she's going to die (again) until after they rush to stop the big baddie, though I as the player at least had some inkling of it by then.

So at that point the Prince asks himself (and the game asks you): are you willing to undo everything you just spent all that effort doing in order to bring Elika back to life? And for the Prince (and me), the answer is yes.

The in-game ending credits are there because you can just stop playing at that point, with her dead, and not free Ahriman again. Okay, so most people (including me) probably don't have that much capacity for self-control, but you do have the choice.

I can see where you're coming from, but I viewed the game more as a process (acrobatics!) than a destination anyhow, so don't feel like I actually lost anything by undoing my work. I saw the false non-linearity in the mid-game as a much worse problem hindering better narrative.

Zeta said:

It's a shaggy dog story - you play through all that for no point, other than for the Prince and Elika to fall in twue wuv.

Barf. I see enough of that shit from typical Hollywood blockbusters, I don't need it in my damn video games.

XtraFancy said:

I'm about 1/2 through the game and there are parts I really love. The way he travels through the various locales can be very thrilling, in an Assassin's Creed kind of way. My biggest issues are: first, the character model of the Prince. He's way too muscular and Gears of Waresque. Hello! He's supposed to be nimble. It's hard to believe anyone that big could move like he moves. Second, the relationship is just too hammy. She's super serious and he's kind of a dick a lot of the time. Finally, I hate the combat. Truly. Hate. It.

CmdrViel said:

The combat was fairly annoying at first, but aiming for the achievements while killing the bosses at least made it interesting. Once I started to learn the combos the combat became much more interesting as a challenge to pull off larger combos (one ridiculous combo is an achievement).

But yeah the ending was horrible. What I didn't like was the fact that you're forced to undo your work. Oldtaku does make a valid point that you "could" walk away at her death, but i don't buy it. The game gives you back control of the "Prince" and its clearly unfinished - no way to leave the area, recapture your donkey and go on your way. You can only kill the trees and release Ahriman. The 80 point achievement on the xbox, as opposed to the 30 for rebinding Ahriman, also shows that the developers didnt intend for you to walk away at that point.
This is where they really failed at using nonlinear storylines - they still had the option to close this story and make the next Prince a different person and a new adventure, or somehow tie it to earlier PoP stories, or use the same one and bring Elika back in any other way in a sequel (finding Ormazd for example).

Oldtaku said:

Ah, I played on the PC; didn't realize there was an 80 point achievement for finishing. At that point I would agree that you 'have' to play it out - I couldn't resist a 'you beat the game' achievement either.

And yeah, the guy is not very... Persian.

darkopiate said:

I am surprised you wasted so much time writing about one of the most mundane and boring games of this generation, like I am now.

Things like flowing animation are due to a complete lack of control. Everythng is auto fixed if you make a mistake so of course the animation is great... you are barely playing the game. And i hear this so so many times.. the beautiful art direction. EVERY level is the same. Sure, some have building, some are inside and some have different lighting but LOOK AGAIN. When healed ALL of the lands are idintical in colour, style and in most ways layout. Except for the odd mind numbingly easy puzzle.

The design is lazy and repeats itself over and over again. And the way they copied okami (which they admitted) was shameful. Okami had more fun, innovation and actual gameplay within the first 10 minutes that this lazy game had the entire playthrough.

M said:

I just finished the storyline yesterday. Before I send the rented disc back I travelled to different parts of the world just to drink in the visuals and try to cement in my mind the the journey I'd had. I'll miss that place and hope to play though it again, or come back to collect all the lightseeds.

I found the A to A roundtrip that the story does satisfyingly undelines the depth of the prince's character.

Contrary to Game-Boy I think the healing of the land makes quite significant changes to the visuals when you look at the whole land, rather than just the platforms you're using. This is probably due to the way the visuals of the healing focusses directly on the fertile ground, it's not immediately obvious that the swirling black vortex that's under 5 locations has dissapeared to be replaced with a lush delta, that a charred and molten cavern floor that's under another 5 levels has transformed, etc. It's a shame you don't get 'flashbacks' to the way thing were pre-healing without having to restart the game.

In look forward to the DRC and would be just as happy if it adds another 5 locations or if it continued from when the story left off.

monkey said:

Just started playing this a few days ago. I agree that the combat lacks depth, but everything else in the game is so well done I'm more than happy to forgive that. This game reminds me of Mario Galaxies on the Wii. It takes platform gaming in some refreshing new directions.

And girls who like girls who like rumble packs!

Twitter Feed

Recent Comments

monkey on A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia: Just started playing this a few days ago. I agree that the combat lacks depth, but everything else in the...

M on A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia: I just finished the storyline yesterday. Before I send the rented disc back I travelled to different parts of the...

darkopiate on A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia: I am surprised you wasted so much time writing about one of the most mundane and boring games of this...

Oldtaku on A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia: Ah, I played on the PC; didn't realize there was an 80 point achievement for finishing. At that point I...

CmdrViel on A Spoiler-Filled Chat About Prince Of Persia: The combat was fairly annoying at first, but aiming for the achievements while killing the bosses at least made it...

GGP Mailing List

Are you gay and working in the games industry? If you are interested in networking with other folks like you within the industry, try joining the Gay Game-Industry Professionals mailing list. Click here for all the details!


The GayGamer Store

  • Help support GayGamer by purchasing your items through our store!

All rights reserved © 2006-2010 FAD Media, Inc.