For boys who like boys who like joysticks!

Archives:

« Target's Weekend Deal On The Kinect/360 Bundle | Main | Gaming May Reduce Crime Rate, Continued »

Supreme Court Decision On Violent Game Ban Expected Next Week

phoenix_wright_judge.jpg

While I'm sure they're all very busy people, sometimes it feels like the Supreme Court drags things out a little longer than necessary. Pretty much forever ago the Justices heard the case against California's ban on sales of violent videogames to minors. I mean, that was a whole different Governator. His secret love child was only 7 years old when he originally signed the bill! Since then, the case has transferred in name to the new California governor, Jerry Brown, but by the time he took office, arguments were over and it was in the hands of the court. Now a decision is finally expected this week, possibly as soon as Monday.

The case stems from a California law passed in 2005 that levied fines against retailers who sold "depraved, violent" videogames to minors. The Electronic Merchants Association sued, saying that the law was a violation of the first amendment right to free speech, and that similar attempts to curtail movies, music, and television had been ruled unconstitutional. California argued that videogames do special, exceptional harm to minors, which is why they are exempt from similar protections. Whatever the courts decide will be the law of the land: are videogames equal to other forms of expression, or should they be considered somehow more dangerous to our kids? It seems like most court watchers feel that the Justices weren't buying the "exceptional harm" argument, but when it comes down to asking 9 relatively old people to understand videogames on a deeper level than Pac-Man, you can never be sure.

Video Games Supreme Court Decision Expected Next Week [MTV]

2 Comments

adrian said:

Isn't this the supreme court that just ruled public health officials could do nothing about unsafe sex in pornography? Yeah, you're good. Nothing will happen.

Dawdle Author Profile Page said:

If you're talking about this, then no. That's a lower appeals court in California, and the case would need to go to the state supreme court before heading to the Federal Supreme Court. The decision here is actually in line with the thinking that the court won't reverse the ruling in the videogame case , though; they don't believe government involvement is necessary to protect porn stars or children in either case, although in the porn one I'm not sure it's a first amendment issue.

And girls who like girls who like rumble packs!

Twitter Feed

Recent Comments

Dawdle on Supreme Court Decision On Violent Game Ban Expected Next Week: If you're talking about this, then no. That's a lower appeals court in California, and the case would need to...

adrian on Supreme Court Decision On Violent Game Ban Expected Next Week: Isn't this the supreme court that just ruled public health officials could do nothing about unsafe sex in pornography? Yeah,...

GGP Mailing List

Are you gay and working in the games industry? If you are interested in networking with other folks like you within the industry, try joining the Gay Game-Industry Professionals mailing list. Click here for all the details!

Links

The GayGamer Store

  • Help support GayGamer by purchasing your items through our store!

All rights reserved © 2006-2010 FAD Media, Inc.